![]() ![]() so bought my first macbook pro and it could dual/triple/quad/whatever boot all the os's anyway so sky was the limit. The frequent updates and fact they give you free entire new operating system upgrades is amazing too.Ĭlick to expand.I started with linux then years later built a cheap hackintosh, then another then eventually after like 8-12 months was like yeah THIS IS what I want/it works. never stacks, leave machines on for years at a time many times and yeah you forget failures/issues exist. it is the perfect go between for support of windows apps that are also available on mac with all my nice open source Linux apps also ported to it. I'ma Unix guy at heart who was obsessed with Linux but mac just 'works' and 15 years of solid use as my primary os has definitely proven that. I would literally kick the machine down the stairs if I lost pictures for example of deceased family that can't be retaken due to a vulnerable cash in inferior os. I simply use it for gaming and a dual boot or entirely separate machine. it's literally why I'd never store anything I care about on it alongside the mass of easily poisoned viruses/malware etc. Yeah it's very annoying, I was very angry that summit so simple, effective and reliable as time machine doesnt exist on windows. ![]() Thanks for your reply, I read it, and I thought to myself: " it is exactly what should be able to do with Windows to speed up recovery process, but unfortunately my knowledge stops here,Ĭlick to expand.you're very welcome mate. On another hand, I reckon I didn't went further in my quest, I could have run tests under linux, or search another path on dedicated forums, I am not totally giving up yet, but like many other things I wish I could achieve, I must put it aside and wait for the right moment, because time is the most difficult thing to spare in an active life ![]() , it looks like it is an easy process with Mac, and an effective one, I tried to do the same with the task manager, defining a high priority to the process, without witness a tangible difference ĭoes anybody know a recovery software that could use more of the ressources and beeing faster?Ĭlick to expand.Thanks for your reply, I read it, and I thought to myself: " it is exactly what should be able to do with Windows to speed up recovery process, but unfortunately my knowledge stops here,Įvery time I asked or checked, I have read that it is not possible, that the software itself should be rewrite to use more of the ressources, that there is no way to accelerate the process, but I keep thinking that there should be a way, though, I didn't find how. Is there any way to increase the speed of these softwares, or is it normal that it's sooo long. I started the process on friday 's still working on actually.and what is the most frustrating is the fact that the software is running on a dedicated computer with high specs, but it seems like it's only using 0.1% of the proc ressources, and 20% of the 32BG of ram.I tried to define a high priority to the soft but it doesn't change a lotĬan it be Window's guilt ? would it be faster under a Linux os ? I stopped it and decided to give up on that for the present.įew days ago, my sister in law asked me to recover around 500 photos from a small 4gb usb stick, and I used the software again, thinking that such a small drive wouldn't take ages to be recovered I then clicked on recover, and the soft started to mount an image of the lost disk, but after 4 days and nights non stop, the process was still at 4%. The first time I tried it was to recover hundreds of files from a 4TB hard drive unwillingly formated, and I must say that the soft was pretty fast to run analysis and the result came quickly, showing the complete list of the lost files. I bought a data-recovery software called "Stella data recovery premium"
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |